No student devices needed. Know more
8 questions
What were the 3 main points mentioned in the article to support the claim?
makeup and product testing, producing drugs, scientific experimentation
biomedical and behavioral research, education, and testing of drugs and other products
Its unethical, unnecessary and unsanitary to test on animals
Ethos, Pathos and Logos
What is the best definition of "efficacy"?
producing an undesired effect
a highly infectious viral disease that generally affects
children
the quality of being poisonous or harmful.
The capacity to produce a desired effect
What counterargument is given to dispute the view that humans should be the subjects of experiments that benefit humans?
The length of the human lifespan makes the tests impractical
It's more ethical to test on humans
It's not unethical to test on monkeys
There are not enough humans willing to participate in research
What critique do you think an animal rights activist might present in response to the information presented by the AMA?
Animals are valuable in research because their body systems function similar to humans.
There are ethical limitations and laws on the use of humans for
certain tests.
Humans are the most ideal subjects because there are no variables to consider.
Animals have the same rights as humans.
What is "AUTHOR’S CLAIM"?
Their viewpoint and stance on a debatable topic
The viewpoint most Americans have on a debatable topic
The main idea of a text
Another word for a thesis statement of any essay
Which terms can be used to mean, "someone opposed to the act of operating on live animals for science experiments"
poliomyelitis
physiologist
proponent
antivivisectionist
What is another word for counterclaim?
stance
rebuttal
one's position on a debatable topic
opposing viewpoints
What critique do the authors of the article offer in response to their opponents? (In other words, what is the author's rebuttal?)
Animal research has not achieved or accomplished much
A ban on the use of animals would cause dangerous economic and public health consequences
virtually every advance in medical science has been achieved without the use of animals in laboratory experiments
If animal testing were such a valuable way to gain knowledge, we should have eternal life and be far more advanced by now.
Explore all questions with a free account