22 questions
If you live in the Bronx, then you live in New York.
Tracey lives in the Bronx.
Therefore, ___________________________________.
Tracey does not live in the Bronx.
Tracey lives in New York
if you live in New York, then you live in the Bronx.
Tracey does not live in New York.
If and are vertical angles, then and are congruent.
and are not congruent
Therefore, _________________________.
and are veritical angles.
and are not veritcal angles.
If and are not congruent, then and are not vertical angles.
If and are not vertical angles, then and are not congruent.
Determine the law of logic that is presented:
If you are a vampire, then you cannot go out in the sun.
If you cannot go out in the sun, then you cannot get a tan.
Therefore, if you are a vampire, then you cannot get a tan.
Law of Detachment
Law of Contrapositve
Law of Syllogism
No Valid Law
Determine the law of logic that is presented:
If an angle measures less than 90⁰, then it is an acute angle.
The angle measures less than 90⁰.
Therefore, it is an acute angle.
Law of Detachment
Law of Contrapositive
Law of Syllogism
No Valid Law
Determine the law of logic that is presented:
If a color is red, then it is not blue.
The color is blue.
Therefore, it is not red.
Law of Detachment
Law of Contrapositive
Law of Syllogism
No Valid Law
Assuming these statements are true,
If I get good grades in highschool, I will go to college.
I got all good grades.
Which is a valid conclusion using the law of detachment?
I am not going to college.
I am not getting good grades.
I am going to college.
I am a good student.
Using deductive reasoning, if the first two statements are true, then which third statements are invalid?
If and , then-
Assume the following statements are true.
If Allison goes to work, then she will get paid.
If Allison gets paid, then she will go to the movies.
Which of the following is a valid conclusion?
If Allison gets paid, then she does not have to go to work.
If Allison goes to work, then she will go to the movies.
If Allison gets paid, then she went to work.
If Allison goes to the movies, then she gets paid.
In which group of statements is NOT justified by the previous pair of statements?
Student 1 is older than Student 2.
Student 2 is older than Student 3.
Student 1 is older than Student 3.
All plants need air.
Daffodils are plants.
Daffodils need air.
All dogs have four legs.
The student's pet has four legs.
The student's pet is a dog.
All teachers went to college.
The woman is a teacher.
The woman went to college.
In which group of statements is the conclusion justified by the previous statements?
All snakes have scales.
All of the girl's pets have scales.
All of the girl's pets are snakes.
Pizza is good for a person.
All protein is good for a person.
Pizza has protein in it.
All brown things are soft.
Stuffed bears are soft.
All stuffed bears are brown.
All students are invited to the dance.
The boy is a student.
The boy is invited to the dance.
If and , then-
Assuming these statements are true,
If I can afford to buy new skis, I can go snow skiing.
I can afford to buy new skis.
Which of the following is a valid conclusion?
I cannot afford to buy new skies.
I can go snow skiing.
I am going to buy new skies.
I am not going snow skiing.
These statements given are true.
Statement: If Brett gets up early, then he will go fishing.
Statement: If Brett goes fishing, then he will catch a fish.
Using the law of syllogism, which of the following is a valid conclusion?
If Brett does not catch a fish, then he did not go fishing.
If Brett gets up early, then he will catch a fish.
If Brett does not get up early, then he will not catch a fish.
If Brett catches a fish, then he got up early.
Using deductive reasaoning, if the first two statements are true, then which third statement is valid?
Which is a valid conclusion to given two statements:
If I go to practice, then I will play in the game.
Mikayla did not play in the game.
Therefore, Mikayla did not go to practice.
Therefore, Mikayla went to practice.
Therefore, if Mikayla goes to practice, then she will play in the game.
Therefore, if Mikayla does not go to practice, then she will not play in the game.
Complete the following statement using deductive reasoning.
If I live in Norfolk, then I go to Granby High School.
_______________________________________________________.
Therefore, Johnathon goes to Granby High School.
Johnathon will not go to Granby.
Johnathon likes dogs.
Johnathon does not live in Norfolk.
Johnathon lives in Norfolk.
Eva, Ernie, and Erin are an economist, electrician, and an engineer, but not necessarily in that order. The economist works at Eva’s business. Ernie hired the electrician to rewire his kitchen. Erin earns less than the engineer but more than Ernie. Match the people with their jobs.
Eva is the economist.
Ernie is the electrician.
Erin is the engineer.
Eva is the electrician.
Ernie is the engineer.
Erin is the economist.
Eva is the engineer.
Ernie is the economist.
Erin is the electrician.
Determine whether or not the argument is logically valid. If the statement is valid, state the law of logic represented. If the statement is not valid write, “No Valid Conclusion”.
Law of Detachment
Law of Contrapositive
Law of Syllogism
No Valid Conclusion
Determine whether or not the argument is logically valid. If the statement is valid, state the law of logic represented. If the statement is not valid write, “No Valid Conclusion”.
Law of Detachment
Law of Contrapositive
Law of Syllogism
No Valid Conclusion
Determine whether or not the argument is logically valid. If the statement is valid, state the law of logic represented. If the statement is not valid write, “No Valid Conclusion”.
Law of Detachment
Law of Contrapositive
Law of Syllogism
No Valid Conclusion
Determine whether or not the argument is logically valid. If the statement is valid, state the law of logic represented. If the statement is not valid write, “No Valid Conclusion”.
Law of Detachment
Law of Contrapositive
Law of Syllogism
No Valid Conclusion