No student devices needed. Know more
15 questions
(Paragraph 1) What were two effects of the Plessy vs. Ferguson court case?
racial tension was was heightened
racial segregation was ended
racial segregation was determined legal
racism was deemed illegal and unconstitutional
racial tension began to ease in the years that followed
(Paragraphs 2-3) What event instigated the Plessy Vs. Ferguson court case?
Homer Plessy became upset when a black man tried to take his seat on a train car.
The citizens of Louisiana sued the state because they felt segregation was unconstitutional.
Homer Plessy attempted to enter a train car that he had a ticket for.
The citizens of Louisiana sued Homer Plessy when he spoke out against segregation.
(Paragraphs 4-6) What made "separate but equal" constitutional?
Separate spaces were of higher quality for those deemed worthy and therefore did not violate the rights of those that paid a higher price.
There were no rules in the constitution to protect equality at the time, meaning that segregation did not violate the constitution.
Separate spaces were of "the same quality" and therefore a separation did not violate equal protection requirements.
(Paragraph 7) What effect did Plessy v. Ferguson have on segregation ?
Laws that segregated blacks and whites were consistently questioned in the years to come, bringing segregation to an end.
Laws that segregated blacks and whites were given the "okay" by the legal system and could no longer be challenged.
Laws that segregated blacks and whites were brought to an end once the case was settled.
Laws that segregated blacks and whites were made more lenient as a result of the court case.
(Paragraphs 8-11) Select two statements that support the conclusion that separate did not mean equal.
"states recognized them as “separate, but equal.”
"Public schools for black children received less funding, less maintenance, and less teacher training."
"the Supreme Court case recognized Louisiana’s segregated train cars as relatively equal in quality"
"It was not until 1954, almost 60 years later, that the Supreme Court overturned its own decision from Plessy v. Ferguson in a new case, Brown v. Board of Education."
"States passed laws requiring literacy or history tests, background checks, proof of land ownership, or other complex processes just to register to vote. "
The term "inference" most closely means...
a random guess
an idea related to another idea
an educated guess (based on reading, research, or critical thinking)
a piece of evidence found in the text
The term "relationship" refers to...
the effect of an action on another person
the boat on which someone named Relation sails
the status of two people that have feelings
the ways in which two or more ideas/concepts relate to one another
The term "consequence" most closely means...
the effect of an action or decision
the cause of a negative effect
a punishment assigned to a negative action
a random occurrence
The term "objective" means...
free of personal opinions
a retelling of all events
full of personal opinion
a retelling of only important events
What two sentences support that the Supreme Court used the word "equal" to defend segregation? (RI.1.1)
“Segregation was common across the country by the 1890s, not just in the South.” (Paragraph 4)
“... mandated segregation did not suggest that blacks were inferior to whites, because the whites-only train cars and black-only train cars were of the same quality. (Paragraph 5)
“Laws that segregated blacks and white came to be known as a Jim Crow law.” (Paragraph 7).
“Public schools for black children received less funding, less maintenance, and less teacher training.” (Paragraph 8)
“The country may have been ‘equal’ by the standards of Plessy v. Ferguson, but in reality, it was not at all.” (Paragraph 10)
PART A: Which statements express the two central ideas of the text. (RI.1.2)
Plessy v. Ferguson was the first time that an African American challenged segregation and brought attention to the issue.
The decision of Plessy v. Ferguson made racial segregation more widely practiced and accepted in the United States.
While racial segregation continued after the decision of Plessy v. Ferguson, it was not upheld by the law.
The decision of Plessy v. Ferguson proved that both white and black citizens were largely against racial segregation.
The decision of Plessy v. Ferguson ensured that African Americans would face legal segregation for years.
PART B: Which detail from the text best supports the central idea of the text? (RI.1.1)
“By 1896 the Civil War was over, and the amendments prohibiting slavery and ensuring equal rights for all citizens had been part of the U.S. Constitution for more than 25 years.” (Paragraph 1)
“His lawyers argued that the law mandating railcar segregation was unconstitutional because of the 14th Amendment, which ensured equal protection under the law for all citizens.” (Paragraph 3)
“He believed it was wrong to undermine the 14th Amendment in this way, when the majority of the country had favored the new law.” (Paragraph 6)
“Laws that explicitly segregated the races could not be challenged in court anymore; the Supreme Court had given segregation the legal ‘okay,’ and states took advantage of this to establish segregation for decades to come.” (Paragraph 7)
Which of the following describes the relationship between Jim Crow and Plessy v. Ferguson? (RI.1.3)
Jim Crow segregation laws compelled Plessy to protest segregated trains.
Jim Crow segregation laws were made possible by the Plessy v. Ferguson decision.
Plessy v. Ferguson hoped to end the segregation common during Jim Crow.
Plessy v. Ferguson made Jim Crow laws widely accepted, but not officially legal.
How does the author’s discussion of Jim Crow help readers understand the consequences of racial segregation laws? (RI.1.3)
It emphasizes how African Americans had access to lower quality services and spaces, and more difficulty participating in voting.
It stresses that African Americans had to travel north if they wanted to avoid the discrimination present in the South.
It shows how many spaces were reserved for whites, while people of color were not allowed their own spaces.
It highlights how dangerous it was for African Americans to challenge Jim Crow laws in the South.
Which is NOT an example of oppression?
White people inforcing Jim Crow laws
Men hurting women when they protested for having the right to vote
Building skyscrapers without elevators
Making test questions challenging to understand
Explore all questions with a free account