No student devices needed. Know more
60 questions
The systematic covariation between two events:
Description
Correlation
Control
Prediction
Roger was teaching a player on his basketball team how to shoot a free-throw effectively. His intervention package included antecedent task analysis instructions (bend knees, elbow in, push from legs, flick wrist), physical prompts, and immediate feedback. Roger ran an ABABAB experiment with A being baseline (no intervention) and B being the above intervention.
During A sessions,the player made an average of 45% of his free-throws. During B sessions, the player made an average of 75% or better of his free throws. Roger's experiment could be said to have:
External Validity
Internal Validity
Description
Prediciton
Which option is false?
All experiments in applied behavior analysis include these essential components:
At least one participant
At least one behavior
A system for measuring the behavior and ongoing visual analysis of the data
A system to distribute behavioral variability among individuals in a given population
The target behavior in an applied behavior analysis experiment, or more precisely a measurable dimensional quantity of that behavior is called the:
Iindependent variable
Dependent variable
Control behavior
Participants problem
By controlling the independent variable and holding constant extraneous variables, the researcher can achieve:
Valid data
Environmental change
Experimental control
Behavior change
Roger wanted to test one of his basketball players shooting percentage from 5 feet, 10 feet, and 20 feet away from the hoop aligned with the free throw line. By assessing these different independent variables Roger was likely conducting a(n):
non-parametric analysis
component analysis
parametric analysis
non-component analysis
Isaac, one of the players on Roger's basketball team attended all team practices and had a free-throw shooting percentage average of 60% by the end of the first two weeks of practice. Roger started a new intervention after the first two weeks of practice and John's free throw percentage average increased to 80% for data collected in the next two weeks of practice. (Always be aware of irreversibility from a clinical and educational standpoint)
The first two weeks of data served as a(n):
dependent variable
independent variable
baseline
replication
From 3/8/18 to 3/13/18 Roger accumulated baseline date on one of his players shooting skills. Out of 10 shots per session, the player consistently made 1,2, or 3 shots in the hoop. If Roger had not applied his intervention on 3/14/18, it could be assumed that data points would remain at low levels of 3 and under. This would have been (a):
verification
prediction
replication
confounding variable
Assuming practice effects did not effect Rogers player's performance after applying his intervention, the data points after the second phase line could be considered:
prediction
verification
replication
decreasing trend
Roger took baseline, applied an intervention, returned to baseline, and then re-applied his intervention.
The data points in the rectangle would be considered:
prediciton
verification
replication
decreasing trend
Explore all questions with a free account