There is liability in the case.

One of the parties is really bad.

Criminal violations have occurred.

There is both a liability and criminal violations have occured.

$1,700,000.

$2,400,000.

$700,000

$400,000

Discovery phase of the case.

Trial stage of the case.

Initial pleadings in the case.

Closing arguments in the case.

Is given under oath.

Is taken during the discovery period of the case.

All of these

None of these

Are used exclusively in state courts.

Were created to ensure quality expert testimony in federal courts.

Relate to scientific experts but not to financial experts in cases.

Have little impact on cases.

There was no liability, only damages.

The plaintiff in the case should be placed in a position economically equivalent to that absent the harm from the tort.

All relevant costs resulting from the breach of contract should be included.

Only the incremental revenues resulting from the tort should be included.

Rendered at the end of the case after the judge/jury has heard and summarized all of the case testimony.

A seldom used trial technique in which an attorney attempts to summarize the case data as part of closing arguments.

An attempt by one or both sides in a case to ask the judge to accept their arguments in the case as correct and to render an opinion in the case in their favor without even going to trial.

A period technique used during the discovery phase of the case to periodically summarize the issues that have been present in the case.

A process of discrediting an opposing expert witness that is used in federal court but not in state courts.

A legal brief filed during discovery to discredit an opposing expert’s education.

A process of discrediting an opposing expert witness that is no longer used since the use of the Daubert challenge.

The opposing attorney’s questioning of the expert’s credentials, knowledge, or experience in relation to the case.

It provides a logical conceptual structure for the damage calculations.

It gives the expert a foundation to support and explain the damage calculations to the court.

Some judges request/require experts to provide such information.

All of the answers are correct.

the framework for a cost reconstruction system.

the nature and timing of repair and maintenance capitalization versus expensing.

the use of cost behavior, fixed, variable, and mixed costs.

allocated costs and the appropriate allocation base.